On Sale Now!
I know quite a few of our readers have been waiting for this to open up again and I’m pleased to say it’s open now, for about a week, so now is the time to grab it while you can.
Our own trial of this is going well. After 8 weeks we’ve turned a £2,500 starting bank into £4,110, so a 64% gain in two months. That’s certainly not to be sniffed at.
To remind you, this is very simple to operate. You log in to the website and buy, sell or sit on hands as directed. The trade signal tells you the trade direction and trading range, so all you need to do is place your trade at an appropriate broker any time between 7:05 a.m. and 7:55 a.m. The whole procedure takes just a few minutes a day if there is a trade, or a few seconds if not..
2017 was a bit of a runaway success for DiffCode Global and 2018 has already bagged 6 more winners.
In total in 2017 the system turned a nominal £10,000 bank into £26,041.75 (160.41% return).
Each and every trade was placed on a spread betting account and is full auditable.
They launched the system to the public on the 27th of September and amazingly the performance actually got better, turning a nominal starting bank of £10k on the 27th of Sept into £19,817.20 (98.17%) to the end of December.
52 trades placed, 42 winners (80.77%) and 10 losses (19.23%).
There is a brief window of opportunity to get this strategy now for a one off cost of £297 with a risk free guarantee HERE.
Whist I agree with the report here, Diff Code Global is a resounding success, I’m a little concerend about the table of results contained in the ‘HERE’ link.
The results include the period 21st Dec – 4th January when we were advised against trading over the holiday period. I assume this is because had trades been taken during this period they would have been profitable? I wonder if they would have been included if they had been losses or is that the cynic in me?!
This is not meant to detract from the system itself, it’s just that they should be a bit more honest when reporting results.
I guess that’s marketeers for you!
Hi Paul,
Mark is absolutely transparent and honest when it comes to published results. The results are exactly what the STRATEGY provides. So he may well advise not trading over certain periods but he always publishes the results, good and bad, exactly as the strategy provides. It’s entirely up to you if you choose to trade them or not. No conspiracies here.
I think we shall agreee to differ then. On the trader’s forum for example the period in question is highlighted and flagged as ‘advised not to trade’ and the results not added to the overall running profit total.
On the public marketing pages to woo potential new customers, the results are included with no mention of traders being advised not to trade during this period. Of course it makes December a lot more respectable to include these trades than it actually was (for those of us who heeded the advice). Without the period in question it would have been a far more moderate return with 5 winners and 4 losers.
As I say, good system so far, which has caught the January blues for now, but marketing wise in order to be completely transparent,I think Mark should have highlighted the period as ‘advised not to trade’ as he did on the trader’s forum.